ExactCups

HomeMilled powders and grains › Cacao Nibs

Cacao Nibs

One US cup of cacao nibs weighs between 120 and 149 grams, depending on how the cup is filled and which source measured it. That range is the answer; a single number would not be. Every figure behind it is below, with the method each source used.

Also called cacao nibs, cocoa nibs, cacao, cocoa.

Most sites print one number for a cup of cacao nibs. This page prints 120 to 149 grams, because that is what King Arthur Baking Company Ingredient Weight Chart, Anthony's Organic Cocoa Nibs label, Navitas Organics Cacao Nibs label and Terrasoul Superfoods Cacao Nibs label actually measured, and it names the method behind every figure rather than picking a favourite.

Two or more sources describe the same way of filling the cup and still disagree, by 24.2%. That is more than this site will average over, so both figures stand and neither is chosen. King Arthur publishes 120 g/cup, while three major producer labels (Anthony's, Navitas, Terrasoul) converge on 144-149 g/cup. The 24% gap between them cannot be reconciled without measuring a specific product; publishing as a range to reflect the actual commercial variance rather than picking sides.

Cacao Nibs, standard, spooned and leveled. The range across 4 sources, 0.5072–0.6298 g/ml, on a US cup of 236.5882365 ml. No single figure is published.
VolumeWeight
1 cup120–149 g
3/4 cup90–111.8 g
2/3 cup80–99.3 g
1/2 cup60–74.5 g
1/3 cup40–49.7 g
1/4 cup30–37.3 g
1 tablespoon7.5–9.3 g
1 teaspoon2.5–3.1 g
Every published figure for a cup of cacao nibs, with how it was measured and who measured it. ExactCups publishes the range these cover rather than choosing one.
Filling the cup1 cupSource
Standard, spooned and leveled120 gKing Arthur Baking Company Ingredient Weight Chart
Standard, spooned and leveled149 gAnthony's Organic Cocoa Nibs label
Standard, spooned and leveled144 gNavitas Organics Cacao Nibs label
Standard, spooned and leveled144 gTerrasoul Superfoods Cacao Nibs label

Why this page publishes a range

TL;DR: King Arthur publishes cacao nibs at 120 grams per US cup, but three major producer labels (Anthony's, Navitas, Terrasoul) cluster at 144-149 g/cup. The producer figures are more consistent with the physical density of broken cacao and are the better default for anyone measuring by weight.

Cacao nibs are broken pieces of fermented, roasted (or raw) cacao bean, typically 2-5 mm across. Because they are broken chunks rather than a powder, the density of a scooped cup depends heavily on the specific piece size, how tightly they settle in the container, and how much they were shaken or tapped before measuring. This makes cacao nibs unusually sensitive to measurement method — more so than a flour or a granulated sugar.

There is a real disagreement in the reference data. King Arthur's ingredient chart lists 1 cup at 120 grams (4.25 oz). Three widely-distributed producer labels tell a different story: Anthony's Organic Cocoa Nibs prints 3 tbsp at 28 g (149 g/cup), Navitas Organics prints 1 tsp at 3 g (144 g/cup by linear scaling), and Terrasoul Superfoods also prints 1 tsp at 3 g (144 g/cup). The 120 g/cup and 145 g/cup figures cannot both be right for the same physical product — they represent a 20-25% disagreement, which is large enough to change a recipe result.

A physical density check favors the producer cluster. Solid cacao has a density near 1.1 g/mL. Broken pieces packed into a container leave air gaps between them; typical packing efficiencies for irregular broken material fall between 55% and 65% of the solid density, giving an expected range of 0.60-0.72 g/mL, or roughly 142-170 g/cup. Anthony's at 149 g/cup sits right in this window. King Arthur's 120 g/cup would require the nibs to pack at only 46% of solid density, which is low even for very loosely-settled material.

One caveat: Navitas's own labeling is internally inconsistent. Their 1 tsp = 3 g panel implies 144 g/cup, but their 3 tbsp = 190 calorie count implies closer to 176 g/cup (about 11 g per tablespoon). This is likely a rounding artifact from Navitas printing the same product with different serving-size conventions across product runs, but it suggests that even the producer figures should be treated as approximate.

What to do in practice: if you are following a King Arthur recipe by weight, use their 120 g/cup figure — the recipe was tested against that assumption. If you are working from a general recipe that specifies cups without a weight, the safer default is the producer cluster around 144-149 g/cup, since that is what three of the largest cacao nib brands print on the bags people are actually measuring from.

For anything more precise than 'a cup', weigh the nibs directly. A digital kitchen scale eliminates the packing-density question entirely, and cacao nibs are dense and small enough that a few grams of scatter around the target weight is a rounding error, not a recipe failure.

Sources

Standard, spooned and leveled — no single figure published

King Arthur publishes 120 g/cup, while three major producer labels (Anthony's, Navitas, Terrasoul) converge on 144-149 g/cup. The 24% gap between them cannot be reconciled without measuring a specific product; publishing as a range to reflect the actual commercial variance rather than picking sides.

Confidence: lowLast checked 2026-09-21Schema v3

SwapGenie

Scan a grocery barcode, get a better version of the same thing.

I built SwapGenie for the problem this site cannot solve: the label. It reads a barcode, scores the product against your own allergens and diet rather than a generic grade, and suggests what to buy instead. Android now, iOS in progress.

SwapGenie is in closed testing, and the first 100 testers get 3 months of Pro free.

Get it on Google Play (coming soon) Download on the App Store (coming soon)

Used once, to send you the link and your code. Nothing else, ever. swapgenie.app